Slammie Poo really loves me!
Nov. 12th, 2004 09:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
naruki_oniApparently the arrogant worm wants me to go to hell, as he said here and here. He he he.
The funny part is how this social imbecile keeps pissing and moaning that I always attack him without provocation. (For reference, this is the same asshole I defended when his stupid comments were - IMO - misinterpreted by the mods and would have gotten him kicked over at UF.)
It's proof that God doesn't exist, anyway. Or that if He did, He'd be long dead by now. Being the Creator of something that unbearably stupid and not smiting it would kill any Being. ;-)
Inevitably, the chickenshit will delete his posts, so I'll mention now that in the first one I was in Circle IIX (Immersed in Excrement) along with Militant Vegans, but the second post saw me get a promotion to Circle IX (Frozen in Ice) along with Objectivists, Religious Right, and Tax Reformers.
Objectivists? That is the most evil thing he can think of (besides me, of course)? Oh my fucking god, that's so pathetic. I see he at least placed himself in the first circle on each try.
Oh, what the hell. Let's see everything he said just for posterity's sake:
With any luck, he'll try to claim "intellectual property" theft again. That'd just make it too funny.
The funny part is how this social imbecile keeps pissing and moaning that I always attack him without provocation. (For reference, this is the same asshole I defended when his stupid comments were - IMO - misinterpreted by the mods and would have gotten him kicked over at UF.)
It's proof that God doesn't exist, anyway. Or that if He did, He'd be long dead by now. Being the Creator of something that unbearably stupid and not smiting it would kill any Being. ;-)
Inevitably, the chickenshit will delete his posts, so I'll mention now that in the first one I was in Circle IIX (Immersed in Excrement) along with Militant Vegans, but the second post saw me get a promotion to Circle IX (Frozen in Ice) along with Objectivists, Religious Right, and Tax Reformers.
Objectivists? That is the most evil thing he can think of (besides me, of course)? Oh my fucking god, that's so pathetic. I see he at least placed himself in the first circle on each try.
Oh, what the hell. Let's see everything he said just for posterity's sake:
|
With any luck, he'll try to claim "intellectual property" theft again. That'd just make it too funny.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Well dammit.
Date: 2004-11-12 06:37 pm (UTC)I was impressed that you are worse than Bill Clinton and geeks. :D
Heh. Too late!
Date: 2004-11-12 06:48 pm (UTC)What did that pompous windbag say to me? Something like, "if he said that to my face, he'd be apoligizing or spitting teeth". He he he.
There are a few PETA people I wouldn't mind being underneath. ;-)
Date: 2004-11-12 07:06 pm (UTC)"And the Committee met on the 6th day. Coffee was served. The subcommittee reported that completion of Man might be a little behind schedule..."
As long as I don't have to spend too much time with them...
From:no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-12 07:02 pm (UTC)The other benefit to not believing in that stuff...
Date: 2004-11-12 07:28 pm (UTC)as if...
Date: 2004-11-13 04:05 am (UTC)*waves* You doing allright?
As well as can be expected.
From:Re: As well as can be expected.
From:Maybe I should work for the Psychic Hotline!
Date: 2004-11-13 08:10 am (UTC)I also asked him point blank if he tells SG about the way he keeps provoking me. The reason is that, on the whole, SG is a nice person, but she keeps whining about me attacking him "without provocation".
I told him I figured he was either lying to her or she was just pretending that he was innocent. The difference, of course, is quite important. It means that I should continue to ignore her complaints and treat her politely, or I should start responding to her in the manner that a vicious backbiting troublemaker deserves.
I really think she's just being lied to, though. I hope so.
Is there a problem?
Date: 2004-11-13 09:16 am (UTC)I have to come out of the closet now
Date: 2004-11-13 01:16 pm (UTC)I don't see why that makes me evil... *sigh*
*points*
Date: 2004-11-13 01:18 pm (UTC)That's why you were put there next to me.
Date: 2004-11-13 01:23 pm (UTC)So he sees me as an objectivist and declares all of them to be evil.
Honestly, how does he get out of bed in the morning without tripping on the toilet?
There's objectivists, and Objectivists...
From:Naughty-naughty Naruki needs a spanking
Date: 2004-11-13 11:19 am (UTC)He he.
Date: 2004-11-13 11:32 am (UTC)He's the one who keeps complaining that I attack him without provocation, but he keeps provoking me.
Maybe he just doesn't know what "provocation" means...
IP theft?
Date: 2004-11-13 01:20 pm (UTC)So if he tries to say this post is IP theft, you could sue yourself for half your own royalties.
Hmm... Don't tell the lawyers. Civilization would end overnight.
Date: 2004-11-13 03:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-13 01:46 pm (UTC)I know.
Date: 2004-11-13 03:43 pm (UTC)It should have been private from the start
Date: 2004-11-15 10:44 pm (UTC)Besides, from the person that has such lofty claims of humor, you show an amazing lack of it. But, whatelse can be expected from such a lackwit?
Now let me give you a clue dude; I am allowed to think and say, in my own journal, whatever I want. Just like you are in yours, when you duplicate my posts. As far as the provocation is concerned, that's sufficient. As long as you continue to leave those posts there, consider me provoked and you cannot claim any attack I may make on you as unprovoked. Time is irrelevent here.
I also have your threats against SG on record. Needless to say, I am not amused. Go ahead and attack her and you prove yourself, to everyone, to be the scumbag that you are.
Oh yes, those posts were screened and not deleted.
I hope your job hunt goes well.
Why in the hell should I be flattered that a delusional
Date: 2004-11-16 05:35 am (UTC)And saying that I shouldn't have been able to see it doesn't mean you weren't trying to start shit. It just means you didn't mean for me to know that you were starting shit.
You know, the thing you keep claiming to be innocent of doing?
So, you are saying that SG does know the shit you start all the time? Okay, then, I will adjust my responses to her accordingly.
What "threats" are you accusing me of? You don't have any threats from me on record, you lying weasel. I admit that I asked you if she knew what a sack of lying shit you are.
You see, she has made several complaints about my behavior which seemed to indicate that she had no idea why you deserved to be called out. It's like she was completely unaware that you were provoking me.
Which, honestly, is really hard to believe - everyone and their mother can read the lies and assorted BS you spewed at UF, and now they can even read many of the attacks you made here.
Just because you are a fucking coward who snipes and then tries to hide what you've done doesn't mean you are innocent. But you seemed to have done a good job fooling her.
Given my respect for her, I was willing to assume that she was just blinded by love, anyway. Now you imply that she made those posts in full knowledge that you were at fault. That means that you have just made the case for her to be treated as lying, back-biting scum. Which is a great shame - I would have thought that you cared more about her than that. Perhaps it's because "misery loves company" also applies to people like you - she may not be that, but you want her to become that so you won't be alone.
It's so cowardly to let others suffer needlessly just to cover up your sorry ass. But then, we'd already established that you were a coward, so that's not a surprise.
Just so you know, I didn't deserve to be disabled the last three times. But you did. HAND :-)
My, my, aren't we touchy today?
Date: 2004-11-16 06:07 am (UTC)Even your perverted logic must admit that the company I placed you in would be hell, even for you. Hell isn't supposed to be a ice place, non? I was also not lying, it is exactly the sort of place I think that you should be relegated to. Show me the logic where I'm supposed to like you.
As far as "starting shit" is concerned, you did that when you re-posted my messages and refused to delete them. This is just a continuation. Delete those messages and I'll continue to ignore you. ... what? you have the double-standard where you can slam me in your LJ and I can't slam you back? Show me where that makes sense! Give me an argument where I have to agree to that (or where I have ever agreed to that).
Now, as for the last fiasco (where you go out of your way to prove that you are an ass), the neither SG or I were even aware of the NRK rule until you brought it up. That you brought it up in an irrational, uncivil, and boorish manner is only typical Naruki asshat behavior. Simply letting us know would have gotten it changed with nowhere near the agro. My subsequent posts were purely caused by anger, which is why I later deleted them, as inappropriate.
Delete those posts that purport to be made by me and this ends now, I promise. Of course, I don't expect you to do that. You have no other source of the regular agro that you obviously thrive on and need.
Personally, I don't care too much (some or I wouldn't have created those special hells for you, eh?).
As for what posts I have in my LJ, they are mine. You will note very few refer to you (3 or 4, I think). The ones I do make, you shouldn't be able to see unless I screw up the posting, which I did (I do apologise for that, BTW and FWIW, I thought it was finny). However, I refuse to let you censor my LJ activity.
Now, as far as SG is concerned, one of the reasons that I was so angry last time was that you slandered her over the NRK rule. I think that even you must understand how I didn't like that. Should I start attacking your SO? Should I even threaten to? To give you some basic schooling in civil behavior, the answer is "No". The fact that you continue to attack her only proves to the world the sort of boer that you are.
You may be.
From:And for posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:That was so perverted that it's almost not worth answering.
From:General Asshat says what?
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:The bully accuses me of bullying?
From:You confuse me with yourself.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:It's sheer bullshit, of course.
From:Your posts? Why, yes they are, but your honesty is surprising.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:Sorry, I forgot that you are incapable
From:You wish.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:That's rather well documented
From:There's no evidence there, only your stupid accusations.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:First of all, what dung pile did you climb out of?
From:Re: First of all, what dung pile did you climb out of?
From:So it really was a dung pile.
From:I always use my powers for evil.
From:And there is where we differ.
From:"Evil always wins because Good is stupid."
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:And for posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-16 06:42 am (UTC)At least, this crap is cluttering your LJ and not mine.
From:ROFL!
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:Oh Lord I hope so!
From:You can help, you know.
From:That puts me in a quandry
From:Yes, we already know all your charges are basless.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:You claim to be a bright guy,
From:Really?
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:BTW, I wished you in hell,
From:Damn, you're so fucking stupid it's not even funny.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:Oh that, sorry
From:+1 clueless wonder
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:For you?
From:Don't kid yourself, junior.
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:Lord, save me from those that would do me good!
From:When a blind man tells me he can't see something...
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:Re: Lord, save me from those that would do me good!
From:+1 Insightful
From:Re: +1 Insightful
From:Tempting...
From:For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
From:For the record,
Date: 2004-11-18 12:22 am (UTC)I formally ask you, once again, to remove those copies.
I suspect that you will not comply but, I had to ask.
Why?
Date: 2004-11-18 07:38 am (UTC)Or is it because you honestly believe the bullshit you spouted about those pathetic mewlings being "intellectual property"?
If you were a man of honor (this is subjunctive mood, FYI), then you would not delete or hide your posts in so cowardly a manner.
If you were a man of reason, you would respond with logic to my critiques.
If you were a man of wisdom, you would never have incurred my disapproval to begin with.
If you were a man...
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-18 07:39 am (UTC)