Slammie Poo really loves me!
Nov. 12th, 2004 09:37 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
naruki_oniApparently the arrogant worm wants me to go to hell, as he said here and here. He he he.
The funny part is how this social imbecile keeps pissing and moaning that I always attack him without provocation. (For reference, this is the same asshole I defended when his stupid comments were - IMO - misinterpreted by the mods and would have gotten him kicked over at UF.)
It's proof that God doesn't exist, anyway. Or that if He did, He'd be long dead by now. Being the Creator of something that unbearably stupid and not smiting it would kill any Being. ;-)
Inevitably, the chickenshit will delete his posts, so I'll mention now that in the first one I was in Circle IIX (Immersed in Excrement) along with Militant Vegans, but the second post saw me get a promotion to Circle IX (Frozen in Ice) along with Objectivists, Religious Right, and Tax Reformers.
Objectivists? That is the most evil thing he can think of (besides me, of course)? Oh my fucking god, that's so pathetic. I see he at least placed himself in the first circle on each try.
Oh, what the hell. Let's see everything he said just for posterity's sake:
With any luck, he'll try to claim "intellectual property" theft again. That'd just make it too funny.
The funny part is how this social imbecile keeps pissing and moaning that I always attack him without provocation. (For reference, this is the same asshole I defended when his stupid comments were - IMO - misinterpreted by the mods and would have gotten him kicked over at UF.)
It's proof that God doesn't exist, anyway. Or that if He did, He'd be long dead by now. Being the Creator of something that unbearably stupid and not smiting it would kill any Being. ;-)
Inevitably, the chickenshit will delete his posts, so I'll mention now that in the first one I was in Circle IIX (Immersed in Excrement) along with Militant Vegans, but the second post saw me get a promotion to Circle IX (Frozen in Ice) along with Objectivists, Religious Right, and Tax Reformers.
Objectivists? That is the most evil thing he can think of (besides me, of course)? Oh my fucking god, that's so pathetic. I see he at least placed himself in the first circle on each try.
Oh, what the hell. Let's see everything he said just for posterity's sake:
|
With any luck, he'll try to claim "intellectual property" theft again. That'd just make it too funny.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
That was so perverted that it's almost not worth answering.
Date: 2004-11-16 07:03 am (UTC)I also think that you completely misunderstand what LJ is. It's a Journal, most of which is supposed to be private, and mine is. there's about 10 times the material there than what is visible. I also have 3-4 other accounts, which you do not know about (and never will).
I use LJ for lots of stuff. As in a paper journal, any scribbling is valid. What I apologized to you for was inadvertantly making some of those posts public, when they should have been private or close friends-only. That isn't cowardice, it's sometimes even called decency. In some circles, it's even considered civil behavior. Yes, I know that you eschew "civil behavior". Not everything your momma taught you was wrong, you know.
Unlike UF, LJ is primarily a personal journal. A rather major conceptual difference, which I hope is not beyond you. Yes, I'm being purposely condescending (for a change).
Now, if you want to get your jollies off by calling someone "junior" who is about 25 years older than you, goferit kiddo. Not too many can actually pull that off and make it work.
General Asshat says what?
Date: 2004-11-16 07:39 am (UTC)Do you regularly rip out pages of your journal if you realize that you've incriminated yourself? Well, you probably do.
"close friends only" means you are trying to start shit secretly. You mean to foment nastiness towards me in private, but you apologize for getting caught? Your apology is fucking insane, but I guess that goes with the territory.
You are the very essence of online cowardice. That kind of behavior is only called "decency" by self-delusional whack-job cowards. Your pathetic attempt to bring my mother into this is, well, damn. I already described it perfectly.
I eschew your brand of cowardice, bullying, lying, and other deplorable behaviors. That's certainly not "civil behavior".
But, if it's considered "civil behavior" to roll over when some brainless thug like you takes a swipe at me, then I'll have to agree with your assessment. I am much more fond of defying your ilk than cowing to it.
I don't see how being "purposely" condescending is a change for you. Unless you mean that you are usually oblivious to your inbred nature. Oh, yeah. Sorry, that was dumb of me.
I love how you make baseless assumptions sound like proven facts, junior. And by "love" I mean "am utterly fucking baffled at the sheer arrogant stupidity of", of course.
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-16 07:40 am (UTC)The bully accuses me of bullying?
Date: 2004-11-16 07:59 am (UTC)Yet another misconception, unwanted UFies isn't my community. I have joined it but, it isn't mine. In fact, I'm still working out the "community" concept, on LJ. I actually run other LJ communities. Ones that aren't even associated with UF. Would your dislike of that community have anything to do with the fact that you were rejected by it?
Yes, I prune entries from my LJ's all of them, all the time. I also go back and edit older entries, make something of it g'head! I don't think that it's much of a secret that we don't like each other, either and I still think relegating you to the nether reagions with the Religious Right, an appropriate punshment for both of you. Yes, you can have the "deamon" part.
Yes, I admit fo occasionally being inadvertently condescending. But when conversing with the lower orders, such as yourself, it is sometimes difficult to always avoid condescention.
Oh, although I am quite aware how easily you are baffled, which "baseless assumptions/proven facts" are you refering to. I apologise if this request transcends your meager capabilities.
You confuse me with yourself.
Date: 2004-11-16 08:33 am (UTC)Damn, don't you know anything at all about communication? By saying "your community" I am not specifying ownership, dud. I'm simply showing a strong relationship between you. You don't claim to own SG, do you? You didn't pay for her and have a receipt, right? But she's still your SO. This is basic stuff, junior. Stop with the equivocation already. We're smarter than that.
Me being rejected by a bunch of rejects make me dislike their community? I suppose that's a fair question. I know that I was specifically rejected right when it was instantiated and long before I was aware of its existence, so there may be some meager truth to that suggestion.
However, on the whole, your community is run by morons like you and the Alaskan stalker, and you (plural you, before you go equivocating again) deliberately chose a self-insulting name, and you (as in all of you) struggle to make it look like a pale comparison of the place that you say doesn't want you anymore. It's so abjectly pathetic that I couldn't possibly want to be a part of it.
So, overall, it's not that I'm disallowed that makes it so contemptible. No, that quality shines [snerk] from within.
Your "pruning" is cowardice. You stick your foot in your mouth and then cover it up. That's all it is, but I know you will continue to try to make it sound noble. Like you and "noble" ever met, let alone had a passing relationship. Heh.
You misunderstand our relationship, as well. I like you when you're not being General Asshat. Granted, that means I don't like you very often, but there are moments. You should cherish those, junior. Whatever you feel for me, however, defies reason. Deliberately so, based on some of your dumber comments.
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-16 08:34 am (UTC)It's sheer bullshit, of course.
Date: 2004-11-17 05:52 am (UTC)I can, however, point to multiple cases where you have done exactly that. You're guilty of multiple counts of bullying, harassment, and haranguing.
You did, at one time, wear the troll badge rather proudly, IIRC.
In the specific case you are discussing, it was my top-level post.
Your posts? Why, yes they are, but your honesty is surprising.
Date: 2004-11-17 12:12 pm (UTC)You can say what you like, junior, but without proof your argument is worthless.
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-17 12:13 pm (UTC)Sorry, I forgot that you are incapable
Date: 2004-11-17 12:35 pm (UTC)You made the charges, you provide the proof.
I'm not in the habit of tilting at windmills or trying to prove negatives. You accuse me of bullying, you show where. My statement is that you can't.
You wish.
Date: 2004-11-17 12:59 pm (UTC)As far as anyone can tell from your posts, you aren't in the habit of proving anything, let alone negatives.
Do you remember back when you were allowed to post on UF, junior? Remember the thing that I "attacked" you for? I'm sure we both have journal entries that link back to that (except I wasn't a cowardly fuck like you to hide or delete mine). Your TLP on that day was you attacking UFies without justification. That's proof of your bullying behavior (as well as your full-of-shit behavior, since you were wrong about your attack, as well).
Do you need a link? Before saying yes, remember the last time I was asked to provide proof that you are full of shit and how badly you handled it. Still, if you want proof, I'll be happy to oblige.
And I, of course, would LOVE to have proof of your claim. Go ahead, junior, put your money where your mouth is. The fact that Bill Gates doesn't have enough money to cover your mouth is irrelevant. Just one little link. Go on...
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-17 12:59 pm (UTC)That's rather well documented
Date: 2004-11-17 11:31 pm (UTC)Now, who was I supposed to have bullied and how?
There's no evidence there, only your stupid accusations.
Date: 2004-11-18 07:22 am (UTC)Being lazy, I decided to use your link to find the example I already pointed out to you: click.
That's you being a bully. Now, since I've linked to an example that you cannot delete like the craven coward you are, you can do likewise.
Well, if you actually knew where to find proof, that is. Proving things has never been your strong suit. Making slanderous accusations and running away is more your style.
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-18 07:25 am (UTC)Honestly, I thought his HTML skills were supposed to be better than that. ;-)
First of all, what dung pile did you climb out of?
Date: 2004-11-18 09:23 am (UTC)Second, I of course would not "reciprocate" with that dungbeetle, as his link didn't prove anything other than the fact that he slanders me a lot. When he was supposed to be proving that I've been a bully, he instead linked to his own post, dumbass.
I, on the other hand, actually linked to proof of my assertion.
What the fuck have you been smoking?
Re: First of all, what dung pile did you climb out of?
Date: 2004-11-18 09:33 am (UTC)So it really was a dung pile.
Date: 2004-11-18 09:38 am (UTC)I just wanted to know if he has been abused by the truth before (meaning, he has a grudge against me), and if so what.
But thanks for making me lose the desire for lunch. I need to shed a few pounds...
I always use my powers for evil.
Date: 2004-11-18 09:40 am (UTC)And there is where we differ.
Date: 2004-11-18 09:43 am (UTC)I don't get my jollies from it. I prefer to get those from erotica. ;-)
"Evil always wins because Good is stupid."
Date: 2004-11-18 09:48 am (UTC)I have no idea what you're talking about. :P
For posterity's sake, Slamlander blurted:
Date: 2004-11-20 10:52 am (UTC)Gotcha. ;-)