Deleted Posts
Oct. 28th, 2004 08:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
naruki_oniConsidering how nasty some people get (myself included, when provoked), I figured it'd be nice to remember some of the posts that were made before they got deleted by self-righteous hypocrites. It's hard to predict which ones will get the axe, but I can make a guess in some cases. Like the one I made here:
That post is in response to their oh-so-subtle rule "- NRK rule: Do not try to make conflicts worse than they already are. It is not funny." listed on the community's User Info page.
I imagine their reasoning went something like this:
TacoBrain: Naruki is a bastard for pointing out that I'm an idiot so convincingly!
Slammedlander: Yeah, he is! He's a boy! He's obviously male! I'm not obsessed with pointing out what I think Naruki's sex is!
OzanBaka: English hate me. Me hate Naruki. Hate me. Eat kitten.
iptv_stalker: We should delete all her posts responding to our unwarranted attacks!
Dragoonlady: Order! If I delete all the letters in your post except for two esses and an ay and then rearrange them, you said the word "ass", and now I have to moderate you!
Salegamine: Why does he keep attacking my innocent love who only attacked him first?
blab_rattus: We need to name a self-righteously hypocritical rule after Naruki that will be encoded so cleverly that nobody will ever figure out it's named after NaRuKi. I propose "NRK"!
I could be wrong, though. :-)
That goes well with your lame-ass "NRK" rule, dipweed.
naruki_oni
2004-10-28 05:43 (link)
You guys make up a rule based on behavior you falsely attribute to me, and it self-righteously ignores the fact that had you idiots not attacked me I would never have posted here in the first place. Way to go!
Self-righteous hypocrites are the worst kind of hypocrites. ;-)
That post is in response to their oh-so-subtle rule "- NRK rule: Do not try to make conflicts worse than they already are. It is not funny." listed on the community's User Info page.
I imagine their reasoning went something like this:
TacoBrain: Naruki is a bastard for pointing out that I'm an idiot so convincingly!
Slammedlander: Yeah, he is! He's a boy! He's obviously male! I'm not obsessed with pointing out what I think Naruki's sex is!
OzanBaka: English hate me. Me hate Naruki. Hate me. Eat kitten.
iptv_stalker: We should delete all her posts responding to our unwarranted attacks!
Dragoonlady: Order! If I delete all the letters in your post except for two esses and an ay and then rearrange them, you said the word "ass", and now I have to moderate you!
Salegamine: Why does he keep attacking my innocent love who only attacked him first?
blab_rattus: We need to name a self-righteously hypocritical rule after Naruki that will be encoded so cleverly that nobody will ever figure out it's named after NaRuKi. I propose "NRK"!
I could be wrong, though. :-)
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-10-28 06:26 am (UTC)(Translated from the Ozanish)
I'm not certain which is funnier; your post, or his. :P
no subject
Date: 2004-10-28 06:53 am (UTC)I'm not a reject?
From:Why do YOU matter, dear boy?
From:Re: and who the heck are you anyway?
From:It never will change.
From:It doesn't really matter.
From:Re: Give the man a cigar!
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 11:10 am (UTC)My response is here.
Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 11:55 am (UTC)My response is here.
whiteshadow80's response is here.
There you go with the euphemisms again.
Date: 2004-10-28 07:58 am (UTC)"decency" == "lack of character"
"cleaning up after ourselves" == "hiding the embarassing proof of our being hypocritical assholes"
"crap" == "posts that we disagree with because they show how bad we look"
"stables" == "community of rejects"
"crappers" == "the person we keep attacking first and then get surprised by when they fight back instead of licking our boots and asking for forgiveness for not bowing down to our assholishness"
You are one of the most self-deluded hypocrites I've ever met, Slammie. Go ahead, tell us why you got your name again. That story is always so heartwarming.
Because Because Because Because Because ...
From:And speaking of ancient history
From:Tigger was banished?
From:Re: Tigger was banished?
From:Understandable.
From:You suddenly cannot read?
From:I just had to do the literal translation :-)
Date: 2004-10-28 08:14 am (UTC)But then, we have the decency of cleaning up after ourselves.
BTW until recently, I never even noticed the NRK rule, I was going to ask. Thank you for explaining it.
It's so nice when one can sweep the crap out of the stables, along with the crappers.
NARUKI TRANSLATION:
But then, we have the lack of character of hiding the embarassing proof of our being hypocritical assholes.
BTW until recently, I never even noticed the NRK rule, I was going to ask. Thank you for explaining it.
It's so nice when one can sweep the posts that we disagree with because they show how bad we look out of the community of rejects, along with the person we keep attacking first and then get surprised by when they fight back instead of licking our boots and asking for forgiveness for not bowing down to our assholishness.
PAUL:
Go ahead, tell us how you really feel :-)
Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 12:09 pm (UTC)plblark's response is here.
My response is here.
You're probably wrong then
Date: 2004-10-28 06:31 am (UTC)This is a place we come to enjoy each other's company. In any conflict, there are ways to calm the storm and ways to incite the mob. Please err on the side of calm discussion and try not to intentionally blow things up.
We won't all agree on everything, and why should we. Even though we don't agree, why should we strive to injure others in this community? There are plenty of other places to vent your spleen, take it there please.
Sadly, your recent post is a further example of what Ozan was trying to get away from. Your post reads like the lashing out of an angry person rather than the amusing wit I usually appreciate from you.
I can understand why you would feel strongly about this issue given your run-ins with a lot of the members here. I can also see where you would feel attacked and targeted. I am sorry that is the case.
I always felt that the majority of your posts to UF were entertaining, but then I realized I was skipping over the ones where you escalated things unnecessarily when a little patience would have smoothed things out. I have friended your journal so I can still enjoy your wit, and regret that this community isn't going to be a good fit for you.
Personal insults aside, can you see the intent of this rule and it's positive implications in a new community?
Side note: I have similar feelings about deleted posts when done by the user who popsted them for CYA purposes. I support moderator deleted posts for the good of the community.
If you weren't a part of that community...
Date: 2004-10-28 07:53 am (UTC)Anyhoo, your rejects community has made a point of attacking me before I ever knew they existed, but you only berate me because I had the temerity to respond to those attacks.
You are the kind of self-righteous person who takes the side of those you like and then loudly proclaims yourself to be neutral.
If you can't see why naming that rule after me is deliberately meant to be offensive, then you really belong in that community.
Re: If you weren't a part of that community...
From:Actually I have no way to know if you're wrong in your supposed dialogue
From:I never said the rule was bad.
From:Not all tits are bad :-)
From:I saw it.
From:Re: for correctness sake
From:Re: I never said the rule was bad.
From:Perhaps, perhaps not.
From:Re: Perhaps, perhaps not.
From:That's what I don't miss about you.
From:Re: That's what I don't miss about you.
From:Re: That's what I don't miss about you.
From:Devoted to Slammie
Date: 2004-10-28 08:12 am (UTC)I just know this will be deleted. ;-)
Answer here because you are too chickenshit to keep the truth around: I haven't pre-emptively "attacked" you yet, liar. I even posted my entry about you after you made half a dozen or more lying posts about me.
So, yeah, stop attacking me and I'll stop replying. That I even have to explain this simple concept to someone of your years and experience. Tsk.
HTH
Re: Devoted to Slammie
Date: 2004-10-28 08:32 am (UTC)You're right. It was Slammie himself who posted it.
From:Also, in response to your comment (already deleted, of course)...
From:You are an ass, but that ass-umption is just too much, even for you.
From:You're calling that "copyrighted material"? Ha ha ha!
From:You say you have it...
From:Still suffering from "selective reading disorder"?
From:I'm not making any claims.
From:The case about you being an asshole is proved
From:You amaze yourself?
From:You think way too highly of yourself.
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:For what it's worth
From:You forgot to say SPOILER ALERT!
From:I also mispelled "probably"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
From:Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 12:03 pm (UTC)My response is here.
You could be wrong
Date: 2004-10-28 08:54 am (UTC)I heartily Concur!
Date: 2004-10-28 08:56 am (UTC)Re: I heartily Concur!
From:No one croaked that I know of.
From:You're listed there!
From:Silly person
From:Ah, right.
From:Crazy
From:Maybe...
Date: 2004-10-28 09:13 am (UTC)Oh come on
From:I'm coming!
From:So I was right about you all a long
From:no subject
Date: 2004-10-29 10:38 am (UTC)No, tell me you saw that coming. I'll be disappointed in you if you didn't.
Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 10:40 am (UTC)oompalumpa's response is here.
My response is here.
Re: Post Made by Slamlander "Undeleted"
Date: 2004-10-29 04:37 pm (UTC)Just sayin'.
Yeah, it was.
From:hmmm
Date: 2004-11-04 07:56 am (UTC)i could be wrong, too
Have you ever been right?
Date: 2004-11-04 05:43 pm (UTC)Re: Have you ever been right?
From:I didn't say "right insane".
From: