Deleted Posts

[naruki_oni]

Considering how nasty some people get (myself included, when provoked), I figured it'd be nice to remember some of the posts that were made before they got deleted by self-righteous hypocrites. It's hard to predict which ones will get the axe, but I can make a guess in some cases. Like the one I made here:

That goes well with your lame-ass "NRK" rule, dipweed.
naruki_oni
2004-10-28 05:43 (link)
You guys make up a rule based on behavior you falsely attribute to me, and it self-righteously ignores the fact that had you idiots not attacked me I would never have posted here in the first place. Way to go!

Self-righteous hypocrites are the worst kind of hypocrites. ;-)

That post is in response to their oh-so-subtle rule "- NRK rule: Do not try to make conflicts worse than they already are. It is not funny." listed on the community's User Info page.

I imagine their reasoning went something like this:
TacoBrain: Naruki is a bastard for pointing out that I'm an idiot so convincingly!
Slammedlander: Yeah, he is! He's a boy! He's obviously male! I'm not obsessed with pointing out what I think Naruki's sex is!
OzanBaka: English hate me. Me hate Naruki. Hate me. Eat kitten.
iptv_stalker: We should delete all her posts responding to our unwarranted attacks!
Dragoonlady: Order! If I delete all the letters in your post except for two esses and an ay and then rearrange them, you said the word "ass", and now I have to moderate you!
Salegamine: Why does he keep attacking my innocent love who only attacked him first?
blab_rattus: We need to name a self-righteously hypocritical rule after Naruki that will be encoded so cleverly that nobody will ever figure out it's named after NaRuKi. I propose "NRK"!

I could be wrong, though. :-)

Comments

[blackbyrd2.livejournal.com]

"When in doubt, do the right thing."
(Translated from the Ozanish)


I'm not certain which is funnier; your post, or his. :P

You're probably wrong then

[plblark.livejournal.com]

I find that I can agree with the spirit of that rule at least. Casting the who started it aspect aside, the concept is this:

This is a place we come to enjoy each other's company. In any conflict, there are ways to calm the storm and ways to incite the mob. Please err on the side of calm discussion and try not to intentionally blow things up.

We won't all agree on everything, and why should we. Even though we don't agree, why should we strive to injure others in this community? There are plenty of other places to vent your spleen, take it there please.

Sadly, your recent post is a further example of what Ozan was trying to get away from. Your post reads like the lashing out of an angry person rather than the amusing wit I usually appreciate from you.

I can understand why you would feel strongly about this issue given your run-ins with a lot of the members here. I can also see where you would feel attacked and targeted. I am sorry that is the case.

I always felt that the majority of your posts to UF were entertaining, but then I realized I was skipping over the ones where you escalated things unnecessarily when a little patience would have smoothed things out. I have friended your journal so I can still enjoy your wit, and regret that this community isn't going to be a good fit for you.

Personal insults aside, can you see the intent of this rule and it's positive implications in a new community?

Side note: I have similar feelings about deleted posts when done by the user who popsted them for CYA purposes. I support moderator deleted posts for the good of the community.

[ajollypyruvate]

That's what Kickstart said and Hey, Presto! you're no longer there. Funny ol' world, ain't it?

If you weren't a part of that community...

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

Your post wouldn't look so stupid. It might in fact have merit. Actually, you're probably in the clear because I think you joined after the mess they started.

Anyhoo, your rejects community has made a point of attacking me before I ever knew they existed, but you only berate me because I had the temerity to respond to those attacks.

You are the kind of self-righteous person who takes the side of those you like and then loudly proclaims yourself to be neutral.

If you can't see why naming that rule after me is deliberately meant to be offensive, then you really belong in that community.

There you go with the euphemisms again.

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

Translating from Slamlandese to English:
"decency" == "lack of character"
"cleaning up after ourselves" == "hiding the embarassing proof of our being hypocritical assholes"
"crap" == "posts that we disagree with because they show how bad we look"
"stables" == "community of rejects"
"crappers" == "the person we keep attacking first and then get surprised by when they fight back instead of licking our boots and asking for forgiveness for not bowing down to our assholishness"

You are one of the most self-deluded hypocrites I've ever met, Slammie. Go ahead, tell us why you got your name again. That story is always so heartwarming.

I'm not a reject?

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

Thanks for that, BTW. :-)

Why do YOU matter, dear boy?

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

To people who can think logically, that is.

Don't bother answering - it's rhetorical.

Re: If you weren't a part of that community...

[plblark.livejournal.com]

I knw the membership thing was gonna bite me in the tucus. I joined so I wouldn't have to be screened when I wanted to post things and to be able to TLP. Since I can aparently contain my spleen venting, I was accepted, and have ths far been able to contain my vitriol.

I was intentionally ignoring the whose fault is it and the whole laying of blame because the posts are GONE and I have no way of seeing that. I do agree that the NRK rule violates itself (there's an image) by naming you obliquely and thus escalating the issue unnecesarily.

Note that I said:
I can understand why you would feel strongly about this issue given your run-ins with a lot of the members here. I can also see where you would feel attacked and targeted. I am sorry that is the case.

and

Personal insults aside, can you see the intent of this rule and it's positive implications in a new community?

it's not my rejects community, I can believe they made it a point to discuss you and I can believe that the discussion was negative given your past interactions with them.

I didn't intend to berate you, and am sorry if that is the impression you hold. Actuaslly, I toned down my agreement with you, and tried to just state the facts. I thought I threw in a couple hints about you being the injured party to some extent.


I may have to think about your comment: You are the kind of self-righteous person who takes the side of those you like and then loudly proclaims yourself to be neutral. because it does ring true when I look back at things, and I don't like that. I'd say my fault is more that I loudly proclaim to be neutral and then loudly declare an pinion while trying not to give offense. I should drop at least one of those conditions in any given post :-)

as to choosing who I like and then blindly defending them: it's funny that Slamlander is in the group I'm accused of defending and you're the injured party. I know I offended some people when I defended you and "vilified" Slamlander at times.

reiterate: I was intending to defend the rule, not its name, nor the reasons and history behind how it was created, and am sorry that there was so much tit for tat and sniping involved.

Devoted to Slammie

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

From here:

A note to Naruki

When you don't have an email address for a LJ user then posting a reply to one of their postings and then deleting it will do the same thing as sending them an email (if they are using email notification).



Hey asshole!
Am I in for another round of bullshit from you this weekend? Please let me know so that I can banish you now and skip the grief.

Unlike some, I've never been a Nuki fan, disillusioned or otherwise. I have always thought that you were a jerk. You spent last week-end proving it to many. Continuing your tirades will only convince the remainder. Again, the fact that you are a jerk comes as no surprise to me.

I'm prefectly willing to leave your snarky ass alone. Now, are you going to continue to cry, kick, and scream or are you finally going to grow up?



Thank you.

PS - Don't expect me to leave this post cluttering up my LJ too long either.

---

(Post a new comment)

I just know this will be deleted. ;-)

Answer here because you are too chickenshit to keep the truth around: I haven't pre-emptively "attacked" you yet, liar. I even posted my entry about you after you made half a dozen or more lying posts about me.

So, yeah, stop attacking me and I'll stop replying. That I even have to explain this simple concept to someone of your years and experience. Tsk.

HTH

I just had to do the literal translation :-)

[plblark.livejournal.com]

SLAMLANDER:
But then, we have the decency of cleaning up after ourselves.
BTW until recently, I never even noticed the NRK rule, I was going to ask. Thank you for explaining it.

It's so nice when one can sweep the crap out of the stables, along with the crappers.

NARUKI TRANSLATION:
But then, we have the lack of character of hiding the embarassing proof of our being hypocritical assholes.
BTW until recently, I never even noticed the NRK rule, I was going to ask. Thank you for explaining it.

It's so nice when one can sweep the posts that we disagree with because they show how bad we look out of the community of rejects, along with the person we keep attacking first and then get surprised by when they fight back instead of licking our boots and asking for forgiveness for not bowing down to our assholishness.

PAUL:
Go ahead, tell us how you really feel :-)

Because Because Because Because Because ...

[plblark.livejournal.com]

Cause there's only one Tigger and that job was already taken?

Actually I have no way to know if you're wrong in your supposed dialogue

[plblark.livejournal.com]

Because I wasn't involved in it. I doubt it was as snarky as you suppose, but there was probably some anti-Naruki bias there, and after hearing and assuming the nature of the deleted posts (another danger of deleting posts) I can make a good guess that it was a sniping discussion.

And speaking of ancient history

[plblark.livejournal.com]

They found hobbits! What has that to do with this? BEats me... about as much as Tigger's banishment has to do with Naruki's evolution and eventual banishment.

Re: Devoted to Slammie

[plblark.livejournal.com]

you need to make explicitly (heh) clear who posted what when you psot things like that. I know I had that issue when trying to CYA incase posts got deleted.

I never said the rule was bad.

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

Just the name and the intent behind it. Since it came from Ozan, it's obvious why it happened. I suppose it's a shame that none of the members recognized (or at least cared to admit) that.

I cannot create a new entry in that community, nor would I want to. As usual, I only responded to places where I was specifically mentioned or referred to. The one whole deleted entry started with a slam against me. That's hardly the spirit of friendliness, there.

BTW, not all those mean-spirited posts are gone. Look at the founding comments (while you still can). See that Kickstart and I are both excluded, for example. Little things dropped here and there show that many of the members aren't as openminded as you.

That comment you are thinking about was toned down a bit, too. The original line was quite a bit worse, given my anger. I reread before posting and edited a bit. Hopefully it is more defensible than what I originally wrote (and also hopefully it will not be true very often in the future).

I do not consider tit for tat a bad thing, obviously. I'm just displeased that the tit was negative, requiring the tat to be likewise.

You suddenly cannot read?

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

You know that I said I was Tigger a long time ago and that I stopped. I also said why I stopped. That post is still there and still painfully easy to find again. You know where to look.

Go ahead and misread that again.

And tell us why you call yourself Slamlander again. It was hilarious the first time, and just gets better with age.

Tigger was banished?

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

I wouldn't know about that - I don't recall seeing anyone on UF with that nick.

You're right. It was Slammie himself who posted it.

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

I guess I figured that since the link was to his LJ and that he is the only one who can post new entries that it would be obvious.

But you are right - someone might not catch on after he deletes the whole thread. They might think it went to one of the comments to his attack instead.

I'll try to remember that next time.

You could be wrong

[tigrismus.livejournal.com]

but you're definitely wicked. I know you're in defense mode, but maybe two posts a day, one unrelated for those of us more interested in your other assets?

I heartily Concur!

[plblark.livejournal.com]

:-)

Re: Tigger was banished?

[plblark.livejournal.com]

I was incorrect and misremembered, no excuse!

I somehow tied Tigger to the first Naruki Ban and went from there. sorry bout that

Also, in response to your comment (already deleted, of course)...

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

here to which I have been banned from responding:

I don't believe in turning the other cheek. If you slap me, I don't ask you to stop. I slap back.

Maybe...

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

I'm still getting the feel for this forum.

Understandable.

[naruki-oni.livejournal.com]

I've seen several others misremember that thing, too. I was never Tigger on UF. I've always been Naruki.

Not all tits are bad :-)

[plblark.livejournal.com]

And I am also sorry that there's so much badd blood and ill-will involved. Did you see where I seconded the request for trwo posts a day... one negative and one positive. We all know you exist to entertain us :-) Just think, without the ARS FYOS, we could REALLY get in trouble :-)